Skip to main content

SATYAM = Mahindra Satyam Why Not AIR INDIA = TATA AIR???

Satyam had seen phenomenol growth in last few years, worldwide customer base, soaring share prices, large scale investment plans, big company size, multi million dollar contracts and what not. Everybody saw it crumbling down the day Raju announced mis deeds, and everybody thought its all gone - some foreign media even termd it as INDIAs ENRON. So picture was like enron is gone so satyam will.

Today satyam is still there, up and running with new thoughful leadership of mahindras, solid organizational backup, people willing to do business. Whatever will happen to culprits, debts and lawsuits - its still there - firm and solid.

Question is WHY? Because in its first few weeks of problem - it got able leadership of indutry czars, a clear governance model setup and steering through indian government, a process to get it out of all negatives and providing it new owner.

Now another question is - Why the same cannot happen to AIR INDIA. The situation is same. Nobody - not any single person - did any fraud on the face of it. But everybody allowed it get it to this stage. Under their nose, everybody allowed it crumble step by step, even contributed to it one or the other way. So now its asking for rescue package. What would be a better rescue package than making it TATA AIR? This way atleast a company can be saved, all jobs can be saved, infrastructure can be saved and still it will fly - may be with flying colors.

But the real question is - will babudom (a famous word for indian beaureaucracy) sitting in india's capital will allow it to happen? Will indian politics will allow it to happen?

Lets wait and watch.........

-Prashant

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Master Data Management – Product or Process ?

I have 2 SAP systems and I want to fix my material master, Services Master. I want all that data to be clean, standardized, classified, enriched and load it back to my SAP in next 6 months. What do you suggest ? Chris - one of my key client was explaining during a “solution understanding” call. My sales manager Tom, enthusiastically started talking about new version of the MDM platform by ERP company, tools, technologies, product landscape, licenses etc. After 30 minutes of sales pitch, I could see confusion on Chris’s face clearly. He said - but I don’t want to add any new product in my infrastructure for all this. Can you just implement MDM for me without I adding any new software ?   Both are using MDM implementation as a keyword, but in a completely different context. Chris wants to implement MDM as a process while Tom was trying to sell MDM as a new software. Whats the difference ? Lot I will say. MDM as a product – when you sell a   software license to a customer

Journey of procurement transformation begins with..….. Part II

 Original Blog post - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/journey-procurement-transformation-begins-part-ii-prashant-mendki Procurement transformation journey is complex, cross functional, time consuming and even frustrating at times. The very basic but a strategic step to start this journey is “Spend Analysis”. Again – this has to be done in a right way to get the potential benefits. We talked about that in first part of this article https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/journey-procurement-transformation-begins-part-i-prashant-mendki By definition – Spend Analysis is an analysis of your spend (invoice paid), what items you are spending on (product), who you are paying to (supplier). It looks really simple – no? When I worked with one of the large Media Entertainment company few years back, they had thousands of suppliers, millions of transactions, good amount of Maverick spend. It’s a global business with more than $2Bn in Spend, 12 different global systems. Thousands of transacti

Who in Supplier diversity program - An interesting Aspect

Last week after I posted third part of my Supplier diversity series of - What Why and How, I got an question from my esteemed senior colleague Ashok Pai, Who works in Supply chain industry worldwide for decades and a Client Partner with Bristlecone, asking "When are you writing about WHO aspect of this?" I replied saying I never thought of that angle, as my basic assumption was that supplier onboarding process is part of strategic sourcing and procurement department chain so those are the people who will be implementing it. And then he mentioned to me that "Look at it from supplier onboarding angle, which is a major pain area for US industry". As I started thinking and researching from that angle, I realized that as a part of diversity implementation its easy to say that run the diversity program in industry, capture supplier attendtion, get the diverse suppliers registered and start doing business with them - its hard to implement. Its really hard to get a new su