Skip to main content

Master Data Management & Spend Analysis

"We are investing so much in our Master Data Management efforts. Can you not use the data  that is clean and standardized during that process as a input to Spend Analysis portal - so we an achieve both simultaneously with low cost ?". You might have heard this question - if you are in a customer meeting with those techno savvy big companies just starting off on optimization drive.

What would be your answer ? If you are a sales person - you will think of it as a another negotiating tactic by customer, if you are a IT guy - I can see that smile on your face, if you are a business person - you think its absolutely possible, and if you are a Spend Analyst consultant - your answer is Yes and No. I personally think - I don all these hats, but for this blog - I am a Spend Analyst. So let me explain why Yes and why No.

Yes - If - when you started your MDM initiative you talked to "right" consultant and created a road-map as to how you can accommodate Spend Analysis as a second goal from the same.

No - If you already travelled few miles in your MDM roadmap, and think Spend Analytics data is a by-product of that efforts automatically.

Let me explain. Since the results of Spend Analytics initiative is all based on how good your data is - Data Management becomes an integral part of your initiative. If you pull all the data from your different systems and push it to spend visibility portal - all you will get is a report which doesn't make sense. You have to get the clean - good data. These data steps mainly include your supplier data and transactional data like invoices, PO and Contracts - with all the business rules.

We will look at all steps of data management for Spend Analytics in detail in next post.

Now how is that different from MDM ? MDM is a holistic initiative focused on data. This includes understanding of your existing data landscape, profiling all data objects, defining data governance processes,  designing the output data structures and then the operational part of actual data extraction, transformation and loading. This is a very time consuming, high cost - high return initiative across all business units. It involves mainly customer data, supplier data, product data. A part of supplier data which gets cleansed in this process can certainly utilized during Spend process - but not as it is or with the same template. Now that's the reason, I said - if you don't plan it parallel - you can't match these rules and templates later. If you plan it with the "right" consultants - you can. Yes.

let me know your comments -

Thanks
Prashant Mendki
Follow on Twitter - @pmendki


Comments

  1. Thank you for sharing. Master data management is the lifeblood of all applications. Is is funny how different that question can be perceived depending on your occupation. Thank you for realizing that and explaining both yes and no.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Master Data Management – Product or Process ?

I have 2 SAP systems and I want to fix my material master, Services Master. I want all that data to be clean, standardized, classified, enriched and load it back to my SAP in next 6 months. What do you suggest ? Chris - one of my key client was explaining during a “solution understanding” call. My sales manager Tom, enthusiastically started talking about new version of the MDM platform by ERP company, tools, technologies, product landscape, licenses etc. After 30 minutes of sales pitch, I could see confusion on Chris’s face clearly. He said - but I don’t want to add any new product in my infrastructure for all this. Can you just implement MDM for me without I adding any new software ?   Both are using MDM implementation as a keyword, but in a completely different context. Chris wants to implement MDM as a process while Tom was trying to sell MDM as a new software. Whats the difference ? Lot I will say. MDM as a product – when you sell a   software license to a customer

Journey of procurement transformation begins with..….. Part II

 Original Blog post - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/journey-procurement-transformation-begins-part-ii-prashant-mendki Procurement transformation journey is complex, cross functional, time consuming and even frustrating at times. The very basic but a strategic step to start this journey is “Spend Analysis”. Again – this has to be done in a right way to get the potential benefits. We talked about that in first part of this article https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/journey-procurement-transformation-begins-part-i-prashant-mendki By definition – Spend Analysis is an analysis of your spend (invoice paid), what items you are spending on (product), who you are paying to (supplier). It looks really simple – no? When I worked with one of the large Media Entertainment company few years back, they had thousands of suppliers, millions of transactions, good amount of Maverick spend. It’s a global business with more than $2Bn in Spend, 12 different global systems. Thousands of transacti

Who in Supplier diversity program - An interesting Aspect

Last week after I posted third part of my Supplier diversity series of - What Why and How, I got an question from my esteemed senior colleague Ashok Pai, Who works in Supply chain industry worldwide for decades and a Client Partner with Bristlecone, asking "When are you writing about WHO aspect of this?" I replied saying I never thought of that angle, as my basic assumption was that supplier onboarding process is part of strategic sourcing and procurement department chain so those are the people who will be implementing it. And then he mentioned to me that "Look at it from supplier onboarding angle, which is a major pain area for US industry". As I started thinking and researching from that angle, I realized that as a part of diversity implementation its easy to say that run the diversity program in industry, capture supplier attendtion, get the diverse suppliers registered and start doing business with them - its hard to implement. Its really hard to get a new su